Too many texts

Simon’s illuminating post about Listserve reminded me of the various tools that have changed, or are in the processes of changing, research and scholarly practices. I posted an article last week about the pros and cons of Google Scholar.

Academic scholars have always been suppliers and consumers of texts (as well as other media content). So concepts of prosumption are not alien.

Google scholar, as well as social media tools such as AcademiaMendeleyLinkedInFaceBookGoogle+, and Twitter provide powerful network tools for letting the world know what you are up to. On the down side, it’s an extra burden to maintain this relentless online presence, and renders the research enterprise somewhat individualistic rather than group-based. The tools  primarily exist so you can profile yourself, not the team. It also floods the info-sphere with yet more stuff. Is it all needed?

Read more …


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s